The Witch's Familiar
During
the Medieval and Early Modern periods, belief in witchcraft was rife
and predominant in the evidence used against witches during the
witch trials was the familiar, or familiar spirit, although the
belief in familiars goes back much further. A familiar was believed
to be a supernatural entity, essentially a demon, which assisted
witches and cunning folk in the practice of their craft and was said
to be given to witches or cunning folk by the devil, although ancient
lore says that they came from the Otherworld. The basic idea of a
familiar probably emerged due to a need for humans to communicate
with the unseen world of spirits, with the familiar first serving as
a mediator between the physical and spiritual world. This concept
later evolved, with the familiar becoming
a companion and ally. With the rise of Christianity, the familiar
became a servant, given by the Devil, and was considered to be a
'partner in evil' who helped the witch in casting evil spells. These
supernatural entities appeared in many forms; often as an animal but
were also believed to appear
as human or as a humanoid figure. Cats, especially black cats, were
favoured, with the fear of all cats being witches familiars resulting
in cat massacres which swept through Medieval Europe. The demon
helper was also said to inhabit dogs, toads and other small animals.
Some sources also say that 'traditional vessels for such spirits were
the cat, mouse, ferret, hare, bat, snake, hound, or bird –
particularly a raven or an owl.'
This
connection between humans and animals can be traced back to
Palaeolithic (2.5 million and 20,000 years ago) and Neolithic
(4000-2500BC) notions, and can be seen in old shamanic practices
associated with animal guides. Cave art, including etchings and
drawings, depicts scenes that are believed to represent magical
themes, along with artefacts from these periods representing
different animals and creatures. Many of the animals represented in
these periods are identical to those that have later appeared as
familiar spirits, suggesting that they are related to ancient beliefs
and practices.
The
earliest writings associated with witches and familiars show the
similarity of a chthonic nature, with many of them being creatures of
woodlands, wetlands, and caves which links them to Underworld themes
and deities including Hecate, Diana, Pan and Proserpina. These
deities are often associated with certain animals: Diana with the
hound, Hecate with the toad, Pan with the goat and Proserpina with
the serpent. The various types of familiar are often the same
creatures associated with moon goddesses, mother goddesses and
ancient chthonic deities. Our ancestors believed the night and the
moon to be closely connected to the Otherworld and Spirit World, with
folk beliefs holding that supernatural entities of the night lived in
the dark and wooded places.
The physical senses, hearing and sense
of smell, are stronger in animals than in humans, and, from an occult
perspective, their psychic senses are also stronger. So it is
believed that a close relationship with a familiar strengthens the
sense of a witch. Witches are said to have taken great care of their
familiars. Emile Grillot de Givry, in Witchcraft, Magic and
Alchemy (1931), describes how
witches 'baptised their toads, dressed them in black velvet, put
little bells on their paws and made them dance.' The familiar
also benefits from this relationship, which supposedly provides the
familiar with an expanded view of reality and reinforces the
familiar's energy pattern. And so the familiar becomes the mediator
between worlds. With both parties benefiting, a connection between
the human consciousness and nature's consciousness are said to join,
forming a magical consciousness. With both consciousnesses joined,
the witch and familiar are said to be capable of opening portals to
other realms, accomplishing magical outcomes in both the physical and
astral plane. Legends of shapeshifting witches probably originates
from these beliefs. In a Lancaster
trial written by G. B. Harrison, we are told: 'But the spirits which
appear now as men, now as animals, are, at first sight, more
difficult to explain until it is remembered that in the witchcraft
ritual the members of the coven disguise themselves as animals...
(the familiars) are nothing more than the evil humans who were
responsible for the whole business.' Owls were often associated with
witches, giving us an example of how a witch was believed capable of
changing their form. The Romans actually called the owl a 'strix',
which translates as 'witch', with another term used during the Middle
Ages being 'night hag', referring to the belief that the owl was a
witch in bird form. In reality, the familiar is the magical
partner and companion of the witch, and vice versa.
Owls were often believed to be a shape-shifted witch (
Original)
The oldest
idea of the familiar was that it was a spirit animal of an entire
species of animal, represented by a single form. This is, in some
cultures, called an animal guide or a power animal. These entities
can supposedly be used as a link to Nature. This belief is often
connected to shamanic practices . One of the earliest signs of the
relationship between animal guides and humans can be seen in the Ver
Sacrum, a religious practice pre-dating the rise of the Roman Empire
which is connected with the Sacred Springtime of the ancient Italic
tribes. This rite required the tribe to split up in order to form
new colonies, during which their sacred animal was said to guide
them. For example, the Sabellians were guided by a bull , the Piceni
were guided by a woodpecker and the Lucani were guided by a
wolf.
Over time, these supernatural beings, along with fairies,
were combined into a common mythos. Jeffrey Burton Russell, author
of Witchcraft in the Middle Ages,
tells us: 'The small demons that became the Witches' Familiars of the
later Middle Ages were originally dwarves, trolls, fairies, elves,
kobolds, or the fertility spirits called Green Men...' He goes on to
say that black and green were the favoured colours of witches, with
green being the colour of the fairies. Richard Baxter, a Puritan
cleric, was an earlier figure that viewed familiars as nature
spirits. In his treatise, The Certainty of the World of
Spirits, which was published in
the year of his death, Baxter argued for the belief in 'invisible
powers and spirits,' with the belief that familiars, or spirits of
some kind, helped witches with the casting of spells and the raising
of storms. He was, however, uncertain whether these spirits 'are
neither Angels, good or bad,' or whether 'those called Fairies and
Goblins are not such.' The fact that fairies were often believed to
be familiars of witches shows the survival of Pagan beliefs in later
periods.
Another persistent
theme within the belief of witchcraft is of the witch being
transported to the Sabbat with help from their familiar. Fairy lore
shows similarities to this belief with the transportation of humans
to the Fairy Realm, which is suggestive of the Otherworld, with the
crossing between the mortal and spirit realm with the help of a
supernatural entity. Oral tradition tells us of how witches avoided
detection by meeting in the astral plane to hold their Sabbats. This
was aided with the use of 'flying ointments' which were smeared onto
the skin and, within Fairy lore, the use of some magical dust or
potion.
Witches often used
the induction of trances to connect with other realms and here we can
see the
connection
of animal spirits as the magical partner of the witch. One ancient
technique to induce a trance was to listen to the croaking of frogs.
The frogs movement between land and water was possibly suggestive of
a supernatural power possessed by the frog, giving it the
capabilities to lead the witch to and from the spirit realm. Some
folklorists of the 19th
century, such as Charles Leland, have pointed out the addition of
bronze frog images that have been used by witches to aid them in the
working of spells and magic, indicating a close connection between
witches and frogs. Fairies and imps were also said to aid witches
to travel 'in spirit' due to the belief that they lived within the
spirit realm. They allowed the witch to enter into the Otherworld by
locating the doors that link the physical to the spiritual, which is
possibly why fairies and witches are often associated in folk beliefs
throughout Europe and the UK.
Another
familiar believed to help a witch in their travels was the dog which
was believed to be a guardian and keeper of the passage between the
physical world and the Underworld. While the dog is often seen as a
guardian of Underworld treasures, it is actually the guardian of
secret knowledge associated with death and resurrection. The
Egyptian dog, Anubis, is the attendant of the dead and the soul guide
of the spirit land. Dogs are also associated with messenger gods and
gods of destruction. The dog is often placed in the company of
mother goddesses and healers. Like cats, dogs were regarded as
witches' familiars and, according to J. C. Cooper, author of An
Illustrated Encyclopaedia on Traditional Symbols,
'represent witches as rain-makers, hence 'raining cats and dogs.''
It
was believed that a familiar could be used to trace a witch when
dealing with curses and bewitchment. One witch trial held in 1665
for Rose Cullender and Amy Duny, both from Lowestoft, was concerned
with the bewitchment of a child. It was noted that 'One of the sick
child's blankets was hung up and anything found in it thrown into the
fire. A toad obligingly appeared and exploded when put in the fire,
after which the suspect was discovered and much scorched.' Medieval
Christians believed toads to be 'familiars of witches, symbols of
avarice and lust, and tormentors of those in Hell for these and other
sins.' European folklore shows that the toad had a much darker
position than the frog. The toad was regarded as an emissary of the
'Evil One' in 16th
century England, and was often burned to death as a result. In
Norway, opinions were much the same, with the toad being regarded as
evil, or as the representation of evil, with unfortunate frogs and
toads being thrown onto the bonfire which people had danced around
and jumped over on St. John's Eve. Killing toads in this manner was
believed to ward off evil spirits and trolls which were active on
that night.
In parts of Scandinavia, familiars were often
associated with spirits of the land and nature. Fairies, dwarves,
and other supernatural beings were believed to live within the bodies
of animals. With the coming of Christianity, the practice of
witchcraft went underground due to the assumption that any spirit,
other than an angel, had to be a demon. During the witch trials,
many domestic animals were killed due to their association with
heretics and witches.
Shamanistic beliefs of animal familiars is
that they are not physical beings, but are thought-forms or purely
spiritual entities. They are said to travel astrally, serving as
magical guardians against those who may try to psychically attack the
shaman.
In
1318, Pope John XXII is said to have had nine alleged witches
prosecuted for assorted magical crimes, including their contact with
a familiar with the help of a polished glass. The Church made use of
a collection of scriptures from the Old Testament involving
familiars, although it is difficult to say what these Christian
interpretations of the scriptures may have meant to the ancient
Hebrews. The 'Witch of Endor' from the Old Testament (Samuel 28:
3-25) was often used as the foundation of the Church's opinion on
familiars. There is, however, nothing within the original language
to suggest that the woman in the story was actually a witch. The
original script was translated from ba'alath ob,
meaning 'mistress of the Ob', to Latin mulierem habentem
pythonem, meaning 'a woman
possessing an oracle spirit' which was, in the King James version,
translated to mean 'possessing a familiar spirit.' The Hebrew word
'ob' was used in reference to sorcerers and necromancers who conjured
the dead to answer their questions. The King James Bible translated
this to 'familiaris', changing the meaning of the original scripture
to that of a 'household servant'. This portrayed such spirits as
being the personal servants of a witch or sorcerer. Literal
translations of the Bible do not discuss familiars, dealing mainly
with those that practice the arts of the occult. For example, the
Book of Deuteronomy 18:10-11 tells us to avoid keeping company with a
'fortuneteller, soothsayer, charmer, diviner, spell-caster, a spirit
medium, or anyone who seeks oracles from the dead. The Book of
Leviticu 20:27 encouraged strict punishment for anyone connected to
the occult: 'A man or a woman who acts as a medium or fortuneteller
shall be put to death by stoning.' The King James Bible simply
replaced these original ideas with the use of the word 'witch'.
Queen
Elizabeth, in 1563, declared that anyone proved to have invoked or
conjured 'evill and wicked Sprites' would be punished, while King
James, in 1604, expanded on this and was more specific, saying: That
if any person or persons... shall use practice or exercise any
Invocation or Conjuration of any evill and wicked Spirit, or shall
consult convenant with entertaine employ feede or rewarde any evill
or wicked Spirit (will be
punished). Court officials were often keen to convict those that
were a part of the occult, often coercing the accused in order to
shape the evidence in such a way that made it look as though the
suspect was in clear violation of the law.
The
Malleus Maleficarum
(1486), the witch inquisitor's handbook, gives no actual instruction
concerning the familiar in the questioning and trial of a witch.
This book does,however, mention familiars, stating that an animal
familiar 'always works with her (witch) in everything.' It also
cautions inquisitors to never leave the suspect witch alone because
the Devil 'will cause her to kill herself', possibly accomplishing
this through a familiar. If, during these trials, so much as a fly
came in through the window during the questioning of a witch, it was
believed to be a familiar.
Matthew Hopkins, the Witch Finder General (Original)
The
main period for the focus of witches having relationships with animal
figures was between 1550 and 1650, with Matthew Hopkins, the
notorious 'Witch Finder General', using the possession of a familiar
as primary evidence to prove a suspect guilty of witchcraft. As a
result, many were executed simply for their ownership of an animal,
along with their having a strange mark, which was believed to be a
nipple used to feed their familiar. The courts often exchanged the
term 'familiar spirit' with words such as 'imp', 'devil', and
'demon', so it is not difficult to understand how the oldest beliefs
of familiars mutated under the direction of such religious
authority.
Despite the widespread belief in familiars, the Salem
witch trials gives very few accounts of animal familiars. In 1692,
John Bradstreet was accused of 'inciting a dog to afflict.' As a
result, the dog was tried and hanged for being a witch.
Descriptions of
familiar spirits by witches or cunning folk who had been accused of
witchcraft had similar characteristics. Despite the supposed
supernatural nature of these familiars, the accounts of them are
surprisingly ordinary. They often had normal and affectionate names.
For example, Bessie
Dunlop, one cunning woman accused of witchcraft named her familiar
Tom Reid. Another accused witch, the 17th
century Jane Wellis from Huntingdonshire named her familiars Grizell
and Gridigut. There are accounts telling us that the familiar often
arrived with its name already established, meaning that the witch was
not believed to have named the familiar. Matthew Hopkins declared
that 'no mortall could invent' such names, which, to him, was
suggestive of something diabolical. This indication fits with the
beliefs of the time, with many from this era believing that all
spirits possessed names, therefore it only made sense that familiars
had their own exclusive names. Familiars were described by
those that had supposedly witnessed them as clearly defined,
three-dimensional....forms, vivid with colour and animated with
movement and sound. With their
later descriptions of their smoky, undefined forms,
they sound more like ghosts.
They
were often believed to be malevolent when working for a witch, while
they were believed to be benevolent when working for cunning folk,
with a witch's familiar being identified as a demon, while the latter
are often classified as fairies. A familiar's main purpose is to
protect and serve the witch, as they inherit their new skills. Once
the relationship between witch and familiar was established, the
familiar actually served a variety of purposes. Witch trials show
that familiars were believed to inflict injury and to cause death to
both animals and humans. They were believed to haunt and harass
people, although this was limited to verbally abusing, jeering and/or
threatening the victim.
In
accounts taken from British cases, witches and cunning folk generally
had three different ways in which a familiar would come to them. The
first was that the familiar would impulsively appear in front of the
individual, inside or outside of the home. For example, Joan
Prentice, interrogated for witchcraft in 1589, claimed that she was
'alone in her chamber, and sitting upon a low stool preparing herself
to bedward,' when her familiar first manifested before her. A
cunning woman from Cornwall, Anne Jeffries, claimed that her familiar
appeared when she was 'knitting in an arbour in our garden.'
The
second common appearance of the familiar to a magical practitioner
was that they were gifted to them, sometimes by a family member or,
supposedly, by a powerful spirit. Margaret Ley from Liverpool,
questioned in relation to witchcraft in 1667, claimed that her
familiar was given to her by her mother when she died. Another
example comes from Joan Willimot, a Leicestershire cunning woman
questioned in 1618. Willimot claimed that a mysterious figure, who
she referred to only as her
'master', 'willed her to open her mouth and he would blow into her a
fairy which should do her good. And that she open her mouth, and
that presently after blowing, there came out of her mouth a spirit
which stood upon the ground in the shape and form of a woman.' Other
examples include a trial that took place in Chelmsford in 1556, where
the accused confessed to possessing a white-spotted cat called Satan
which was passed down from witch to witch and a trial in 1582, where
a 12 year old girl admitted to receiving her familiar, a cat, from
her grandmother, which she later gave away to a woman named Agnes
Waterhouse.
In
some accounts, witches or cunning folk are said to have experienced
difficulties in the practise of their magic until a familiar appeared
to them and offered them aid. It has been noted by Emma Wilby,
historian and author of Cunning Folk and Familiar Spirits,
that 'their problems... were primarily rooted in the struggle for
physical survival – the lack of food or money, bereavement,
sickness, loss of livelihood and so on.' The familiar apparently
offered them a way out of this, solving their problems by gifting
them with magical powers. Some lore states that a witch received their
familiar following their initiation into the Witches' sect Witches
and cunning folk often made some form of pact or agreement with their
familiar. This would state a length of time for which the familiar
remained with the practitioner, varying between weeks and, in some
cases, decades. It seems common for witches and cunning folk to
summon their familiar when they were in need of assistance, although
the methods varied. Joan Cunny from Essex, in 1589, claimed that she
had to kneel within a circle and pray to Satan for her familiar to
manifest, while, in 1653, the cunning woman, Anne Bodenham, from
Wiltshire claimed that she could summon her familiars by reading
books. However, in some accounts familiars are said to have had the
ability to manifest even when they were unwanted or when they had not
been summoned. Elizabeth Chandler, a witch from Huntingsonshire,
claimed in 1646 that she had no control over her two familiars,
Beelzebub and Trullibub, and is said to have prayed to God that He
would 'deliver her therefrom.'
As
I have noted briefly above, witches were believed to feed or nourish
their familiar. It was believed that the familiar needed the
nourishment of breast milk or blood, although some witches are
reported to have fed their familiar on bread and milk. However, most
theories of the time suggested that a familiar often craved and
required blood in order to maintain a physical body, as they were
believed to be spirits. While familiars were believed to take blood
straight from the witch, witches were sometimes believed to provide
other sources to feed the craving of their familiar. In 1324, Alice
Kyteler from Kilkenny, Ireland, who was convicted as being a witch,
confessed that she sacrificed red cocks to her familiar, providing it
with a source of blood. Familiars, according to trial
transcriptions, obtained blood by pricking the witches body and
sucking out the blood. This was believed to leave a mark, which was
identified as the 'witch's mark' or 'devil's mark' by witch hunters.
This mark could be anything from a bruise, mole, or any skin
abnormality. Most often accused were the elderly, who often had the
common dark spots which we attribute to old age. These marks were
believed to be insensitive to pain caused by a pin or needle pushed
into them.
Outside
of the witch trials, it was believed that some magicians and village
healers were aided by more benevolent familiars which could diagnose
illnesses and sources of bewitchment. They were also used to divine
and find lost objects and treasures. During rituals, magicians would
conjure these spirits, locking them into bottles, rings and stones
which were sometimes sold as charms, with the magician claiming that
they would ensure success in whatever the buyer sought. This was not
technically illegal, with England's Witchcraft Act of 1604
specifically outlawing evil and wicked spirits.
Modern
witches have their own views on familiars and no longer accept the
Judeo-Christian opinion of the familiar as either accurate or valid.
Familiars are now more often perceived in much the same way as some
American Indians view animal guides or power animals. They are now
seen as messengers that move between the mortal and spirit realm,
healers and powerful allies to those with whom they form a
relationship which are gifted to a witch by the Great Spirit. There
are, to a modern witch, essentially three types of familiar spirit:
the physical, the astral and the artificial. A physical familiar is
a pet or animal to which you feel drawn. An astral familiar is
considered to be an entity which exists within the spiritual realm.
The artificial familiar is one that is created by the practitioner
with the use of magic. In modern times, the familiar assists the
witch by carrying energy for the use of healing, communicating and
spell casting. They are also believed to protect both the home and
personal property. Familiars can also defend a witch during astral
projection and dream-work, as well as carrying information to or from
the spiritual realm.
In
conclusion, familiars have evolved and changed through the years and,
in modern times, have pretty much come full circle back to the
beliefs of the ancients. Familiars have been considered to be guides
and helpers, aiding a witch, magician or shaman in the practice of
their magic. They are said to take many forms, often as animals,
with the favourites being cats. They are, however, not limited to
being only animals, with many beliefs stating that the familiar is a
spirit capable of living within the body of an animal or creature.
They can be a readily evolved spirit or can be created through the
use of magic by a witch. The evolution of Christianity saw familiars
condemned, linking them to demons and the Devil and giving a primary
source of evidence against an accused witch. While they have often
been linked with evil, cunning folk were also said to possess
benevolent familiars which could aid a person with any matter. In
this case, the spirit was sometimes bottled and sold. Modern times,
however, bring us back to the belief that the familiar exists to
protect and aid it's witch by carrying the additional energy needed
during healing, communication with other worlds and spell-casting.
It is now believed that the familiar spirit connects us to the
spirits of nature, much like the beliefs of our ancestors before us.
Next time: We'll take a closer look at the origins of witchcraft.